It looks like organisational agility is the new black. But how do we get there? There is already a rich source of literature on agile practices that we should consider . However, our research has suggested that HR is less certain on how to adjust their processes to facilitate it. The good news is: we have identified 5 building blocks you should focus on to enable an agile organisation.
Looking back to the 20th century industrial age, the success of manufacturing depended on repetitive, predictable and highly standardised work. For businesses to thrive in such a static environment, process optimisation and “efficient Taylorism” were the modes of choice. Therefore, talent practices were expected to be ruled-based and bureaucratic so that long-term goals could be reliably achieved. At that time, it was the smart thing to do.
However, managing organisations as machines became less effective over time. As technology evolved exponentially, competition became global and predictability started to decrease. In the current fast-paced, highly competitive business world, continuous innovation is now a strategic imperative. The new volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous (VUCA) conditions make it unrealistic to hope for “business as usual”. Chances are, whatever organisations did to get where they are today won’t keep them there tomorrow.
So, how can organisations prepare for a future that few of us can define?
To respond to change and uncertainty , software companies were amongst the first to set the example with an agile manifesto for managing projects. Through incremental iterations and cross-functional teams, a culture of continuous improvement and collaboration created and defined the baseline for high adaptability to change.
In the meanwhile, the term “agile” has evolved to become more holistic, and now represents how an entire organisation could operate.According to a report from Accenture: “Agility is a company’s ability to anticipate, sense and respond to volatility in its markets in ways that create competitive advantage”. This agile business approach has been widely accepted as something to strive for (a report from Mckinsey published this year suggests that 75% of companies believe organisational agility is a top priority, and nearly 40% are currently conducting an organisational agility transformation).
At TI People, we have targeted the topic of agility from an HR perspective. It is clear that the current long-term and role-focused talent management practices are not suited for this new approach, and yet, there’s an uncomfortable uncertainty about what to do instead.
While we know HR needs to focus on building a skill-based organisation, two crucial questions remain: Where to start? And which technology to use?
1. Work Decomposition: Work and deliverables are subdivided into smaller and manageable components until the work and deliverables can be mapped to skills;
2. Skill Detection: Skills that are available in the organisation are made fully transparent
3. Future Skill Demand Prediction: Skills that are critically needed to fulfill the future company strategy are defined;
4. Work Skill Matching: Work will be mapped with available skills, career aspirations and preferences and supported by suitable technology;
5. Skill-based Talent Management: All talent management efforts are aligned with work / skill matching. As agile organisations won’t be able to rely on static job roles or organizational charts to determine processes relevant to each employee, such processes will need to be adjusted to the individual skills/projects. Examples include:
– Job Design: have less rigidly prescribed job tasks to facilitate a more fluid workforce with spontaneous problem solving and experimentation;
– Mobility: foster high mobility to enable everyone to pull the human resources necessary when needed;
– Performance appraisal: substitute annual performance appraisal by ongoing feedback. Development and evaluation discussions should be separated so that there is time for more focus on the employee’s growth. Further, since work will be organised by projects, leaders will lack complete awareness of employees work and will need to source feedback from multiple sources;
– Promotion and Rewards: provide instant rewards that reinforce desired behaviors when they occur. Promotions should also be clearly linked to results rather than tenure or seniority;